Should Christians Have Alters?
In the realm of Christian worship and spirituality, the use of alters has been a topic of debate for many years. Alters, which are typically flat-topped tables used for the display of religious objects and the performance of religious rituals, are a common feature in many Christian churches. However, the question of whether Christians should have alters remains a subject of contention among believers and scholars alike. This article aims to explore the various perspectives on this issue, examining both the historical and theological arguments for and against the use of alters in Christian worship.
Historical Perspective
The use of alters in Christian worship has its roots in the early church. The first recorded use of an alter dates back to the 4th century, where it was used to symbolize the table of the Last Supper. Over time, the alter became a central feature of Christian liturgy, serving as a focal point for the celebration of the Eucharist and other sacraments. The historical use of alters in Christian worship suggests that they have played a significant role in the development of the faith.
Theological Arguments for Alters
Proponents of alters argue that they serve several important theological functions within the Christian faith. Firstly, alters are seen as a symbol of the presence of God. In many denominations, the alter is considered a sacred space where God is believed to be particularly present. This presence is often associated with the Eucharist, where believers partake in the body and blood of Christ.
Secondly, alters are believed to foster a sense of reverence and awe in worshipers. The physical presence of an alter can create a visual and symbolic connection between the worshiper and the divine, helping to deepen their spiritual experience. Furthermore, the use of alters can also provide a sense of continuity with the historical and liturgical traditions of the church.
Theological Arguments Against Alters
On the other hand, some Christians argue against the use of alters, contending that they can lead to a focus on ritual rather than on the person of Jesus Christ. Critics argue that the use of alters can create a sense of hierarchy within the church, with the alter being seen as a sacred space reserved for the clergy. This can lead to a divide between the clergy and the laity, as well as a potential distraction from the central message of the Christian faith.
Moreover, some denominations, such as the Quakers, reject the use of alters altogether, preferring a more minimalist approach to worship that emphasizes simplicity and direct engagement with God. They argue that the use of alters can be seen as a form of idolatry, as it can lead worshipers to focus on the physical object rather than on the divine.
Conclusion
The question of whether Christians should have alters is a complex one, with strong arguments on both sides. While the historical and theological reasons for using alters in Christian worship are compelling, it is also important to consider the potential drawbacks and the diverse practices within the Christian community. Ultimately, the decision to use an alter should be a matter of personal conviction and community discernment, reflecting the unique spiritual needs and traditions of each congregation.
